Energy requirement AMEn vs AME

Home Forums Poultry feeding and nutrition Energy requirement AMEn vs AME

  • Energy requirement AMEn vs AME

    Posted by Lenitta Lopez on March 27, 2025 at 2:46 pm

    Majority of broiler strains list the energy requirement for their birds in AMEn. What do you do if your nutrient database is in AME only (you don’t have info on the AMEn)?

    Amir Sohel replied 1 year, 2 months ago 8 Members · 7 Replies
  • 7 Replies
  • Amir Sohel

    Member
    April 3, 2025 at 8:22 am

    In animal nutrition, AMEn (nitrogen-corrected apparent metabolizable energy) is a refinement of AME (apparent metabolizable energy) that accounts for nitrogen retention, improving the accuracy of energy value assessment in feed formulation.

  • Babafemi Adejinmi

    Member
    April 1, 2025 at 7:01 am

    In the last webinar the host spoke alot about AME and AMEn please revert to the lecture….

  • Jeffery Escobar

    Member
    April 1, 2025 at 12:43 am

    Most databases containing the nutrient profile of ingredients have AME and the nutrient recommendations from most breeding companies are in AME. Thus, I would recommend using AME. Important: try avoid as much as possible to use AME values for some ingredients and AMEn values for other ingredients in your feed formulation software.

  • Edwin Weber Inibi

    Member
    March 30, 2025 at 2:33 pm

    Very informative

  • Olayiwola Danso

    Member
    March 29, 2025 at 4:46 pm

    If your nutrient database provides only AME (Apparent Metabolizable Energy) but broiler strain recommendations are in AMEn (Nitrogen-Corrected Apparent Metabolizable Energy), you need to convert AME to AMEn.

    Here’s how:

    AME (Apparent Metabolizable Energy) measures total energy available after digestion, but does not account for nitrogen losses in urine.

    AMEn (Nitrogen-Corrected Apparent Metabolizable Energy), adjusts for nitrogen losses, providing a more accurate energy value for poultry, especially in diets with high protein.

    Conversion formula:

    To estimate AMEn from AME, use the formula:<math xmlns=”http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML” display=”block”><semantics><mrow><mi>
    </mi></mrow></semantics></math>

    <math xmlns=”http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML” display=”block”><semantics><mrow><mi>AMEn = AME − (8.22 × NR​)</mi></mrow></semantics></math>

    Where:

    N_R = Nitrogen retention (g/g of feed)

    8.22 = Correction factor based on energy lost per gram of nitrogen

    If nitrogen retention (N_R) is unavailable, a general approximation is:

    <math xmlns=”http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML” display=”block”><semantics><mrow><mi>
    </mi></mrow><annotation encoding=”application/x-tex”>AMEn \approx AME – 5 \text{ to } 10 kcal/kg</annotation></semantics></math>AMEn = AME − 5 to 10kcal/kg<div>

    For standard poultry diets, AMEn is typically 20 – 50 kcal/kg lower than AME, depending on protein content

    </div>

  • Suresh Bypanahalli

    Member
    March 27, 2025 at 10:05 pm

    Scientists at Massey University, New Zealand suggest that feed formulation based on uncorrected AME values could benefit least cost broiler feed formulations. Correcting AME values to zero N retention (AMEn) for modern broilers penalizes the energy value of protein sources and is of higher magnitude for ingredients with higher protein quality.

  • Md. Osman Sheikh

    Member
    March 27, 2025 at 3:32 pm

    An experiment was conducted to reevaluate the concept of using AME vs. AME(n) values for broiler diets.

Log in to reply.