Impact of feed quality on animal health and productivity

Home Forums Food Safety and Biosecurity in the Global Animal Feed Manufacturing Industry Impact of feed quality on animal health and productivity

  • Impact of feed quality on animal health and productivity

    Posted by Ahmed Reda ElGhandour on April 6, 2026 at 8:29 pm

    <div>Preventing and controlling feed-borne
    pathogens is vital for the health and productivity of our production
    systems, as the introduction and spread of pathogens can compromise
    intestinal integrity, leading to inflammation, dysbiosis and increased
    disease susceptibility. An integrated feed biosecurity approach is
    essential for keeping the feed safe.</div>

    A high-quality feed includes essential elements like balanced nutrients,
    excellent digestibility, and safety. The quality of feed significantly
    influences the overall health of poultry and swine by providing
    essential nutrients that support growth and physiological functions,
    including maintaining a functional immune response. In contrast,
    poor-quality diets can lead to nutrient deficiencies and introduce
    harmful contaminants such as pathogens, toxins, and chemical residues.
    These contaminants can compromise animal health, cause dysbiosis, and
    negatively impact overall health and productivity.

    FEED BIOSECURITY CHALLENGES
    Feed contamination and recontamination can occur from various steps within the feed supply chain, from sourcing raw materials, storage, to transporting finished feed. Pathogen contamination by bacterial, fungal and viral organisms negatively impacts the microbial quality and compromises feed biosecurity. Understanding the types of pathogens that can contaminate feed and their effects on animal health is crucial for developing effective management strategies.

    For instance, Salmonella in poultry is frequently associated with animal feed and poses significant health risks to both animals and humans. Salmonella-positive ingredients are more prevalent in animal-based products. However, plant-based ingredients can also be contaminated from storage, transportation, or handling. Since there are no trading rules specifically addressing Salmonella in these ingredients, implementing an effective monitoring program to screen incoming ingredients carefully remains the most responsible approach to prevent Salmonella from entering the system.

    Although we may encounter limitations in sourcing ingredients, preventive measures and treatments applied to these ingredients can prevent the pathogen from entering our production system.

    Another feed-source pathogen, Clostridium perfringens, can cause subclinical symptoms that affect the uniformity and performance of the flock, while clinical symptoms lead to necrotic enteritis and high mortality rates. Escherichia coli is often a food safety concern in poultry and enterotoxigenic strains (ETEC) are a particular problem in piglets and can lead to enteric colibacillosis, characterized by severe, watery diarrhea and dehydration, which can further cause acidosis and sudden death.

    Fungal contamination in feed, particularly mycotoxins such as aflatoxins, fumonisins, deoxynivalenol (DON), and zearalenone (ZEN), can lead to a variety of problems. These include damage to the liver, kidneys and intestines, which can affect metabolism and nutrient utilization, ultimately impacting the animal’s growth performance. Additionally, these toxins can weaken the immune system, making animals more susceptible to illness, and cause reproductive issues by disrupting hormonal balance.

    Viruses were not considered a risk in swine feed until it was confirmed that porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRS) and African swine fever virus (ASFv) could survive in feed and feed ingredients. The risk from avian influenza virus (AIV) seems lower compared to swine viruses, but feed biosecurity measures, such as regular screening and hygiene management, remain important.

    PEDV primarily targets the intestinal lining, resulting in diarrhea, dehydration, and malnutrition. PRRS compromises the immune system, leading to secondary gut infections and impaired nutrient absorption. ASFV, being more systemic, inflicts severe internal damage, including hemorrhagic enteritis. In poultry, HPAI disrupts intestinal health through inflammation and immune suppression, reducing nutrient uptake. These viruses significantly diminish animal performance and increase mortality rates. Transmission through contaminated feed underscores the importance of stringent biosecurity measures, making effective feed biosecurity essential.

    Ali Badawi Mohamed replied 2 months, 2 weeks ago 3 Members · 2 Replies
  • 2 Replies

Log in to reply.